Here’s a Question I Like To Ask when arguing biblical accuracy versus scientific discovery:
Postulating an omnipotent God and his potent yet subordinate nemesis: Which has the power to influence the minds of a few men to compose a persuasive text and create a regional following, and which to deposit billions of consistent clues about creation into the ground, the seas, and the heavens, from the scale of muons to the size of galactic superclusters?
It really comes down to whether one chooses to believe in an interpretation of a translation of a much edited anthology of ancient scraps of text (“truth”), or in physical evidence that anyone can see and measure, with some training (“just a theory”).
I almost posted this as yet another response under grumpypilgrim’s Apes wearing pants [1], but it was wandering too far from the original point.
Print this post [2]
[3]