- Dangerous Intersection - https://dangerousintersection.org/ -

What does the New Testament actually say about morality?

In a short article called “The Myth of Secular Moral Chaos,” [1] Sam Harris asks this simple question: What does the New Testament actually say about morality?  As a warm-up, he describes Old Testament morality (sometimes cited and approved in the new testament):

Human sacrifice, genocide, slaveholding, and misogyny are consistently celebrated. Of course, God’s counsel to parents is refreshingly straightforward: whenever children get out of line, we should beat them with a rod (Proverbs 13:24, 20:30, and 23:13–14). If they are shameless enough to talk back to us, we should kill them (Exodus 21:15, Leviticus 20:9, Deuteronomy 21:18–21, Mark 7:9–13, and Matthew 15:4–7). We must also stone people to death for heresy, adultery, homosexuality, working on the Sabbath, worshiping graven images, practicing sorcery, and a wide variety of other imaginary crimes.

When I told a fundamentalist relative that such writings disturbed me and that they did not inspire me, she said: “You shouldn’t read so much of the Old Testament and focus on those things that trouble you. Instead, you need to read more of the New Testament.” Although she claimed that the Bible was “perfect and without any contradictions,” apparently (for her), the New Testament was more perfect than the Old Testament. Harris has also heard this claim, from Christians, that Jesus is kinder and gentler than the Old Testament God.  Harris therefore checked the New Testament:

Most Christians imagine that Jesus did away with all this barbarism and delivered a doctrine of pure love and toleration. He didn’t. (See Matthew 5:18–19, Luke 16:17, 2 Timothy 3:16, 2 Peter 20–21, John 7:19.) Anyone who believes that Jesus only taught the Golden Rule and love of one’s neighbor should go back and read the New Testament. And he or she should pay particular attention to the morality that will be on display if Jesus ever returns to earth trailing clouds of glory (e.g., 2 Thessalonians 1:7–9, 2:8; Hebrews 10:28–29; 2 Peter 3:7; and all of Revelation).

After reading Harris, I was inspired to pull out my New Testament; I also consulted the Skeptic’s Annotated Bible [2].  I will be quoting much of the following from the Bible itself, with some of this material compiled from the SAB, a comprehensive database highlighting many of the contradictions, injustices and episodes of violence in the Bible.

Matthew 5:17

Luke 16:17

2 Thessalonians

Hebrews

2 Peter

Revelation

Somehow, I suppose, those who make it to heaven will still be able to enjoy life in the clouds, despite the constant noise and commotion resulting from the torture of some of their friends and loved ones going on down below.

It’s interesting that an omnipotent God would not able to summon up enough compassion to simply leave non-believers alone, especially non-believers who have spent lifetimes being generous to others.  Why not just let those nonbelievers dissolve into nothingness when they die?  For them, death could be the same condition that preceded their birth–a long sleep.  But no.  For the New Testament God, this just won’t do.  For clearly stated reasons of “vengeance,” God has allegedly willed that non-believers will need to suffer constant physical torture for eternity.  No parole.  No pardon.  No hope.  It is shocking behavior like this that leads many believers to claim that God is “beyond” morality.  Believers intend this to be a compliment.  God’s behaviour (described above) certainly wouldn’t qualify as “moral” by any human metric.

My little field trip reinforced my belief that most Believers don’t really believe in the Bible. Anyone reading these New Testament morality lessons with an open mind would be shocked at this version of “justice.” I can only conclude (as suggested by Daniel Dennett in Breaking the Spell), that most believers don’t really believe these things; rather, they believe that they are SUPPOSED to believe these things.  Most Christians to whom I have spoken over the years are not comfortable discussing these distressing parts of the Good Book.

Christians commonly claim to be God’s “friend.”  For Christians who might be reading this: if any of your other friends acted with such cold and sustained vengeance, wouldn’t you speak up?  Wouldn’t you say, “Hey!  Have a heart!  Stop those locust/horses-with-human-heads-women’s-hair-lion’s-teeth-and-scorpion-tails from stinging people!  Can’t you see that those poor people are BEGGING to be allowed to die! Yes, I admit that they failed to fully appreciate your unlimited love and kindness, but can’t you now see why?”  For any of your earthly friends, wouldn’t you intervene?  Get in his face? Call the police?  Threaten to call off the friendship? 

And if you’re trying to dissuade an omnipotent friend from continuing a torture party, wouldn’t you add that His sacred writings are sure causing LOTS of confusion and bloodshed down on Earth? People stabbing and clubbing each other based on tiny differences in the way people practice their religions.  You might mention that even if there were no non-believers, these different styles of believers would be at each others’ throats.  You might even suggest to Him that there are better, kinder, versions of the ten commandments that would result in a lot less bloodshed [3].

In his article, Harris concludes, “It is not an accident that St. Thomas Aquinas thought heretics should be killed and that St. Augustine thought they should be tortured.”  To Harris, the notion that the Bible is a perfect guide to morality “is really quite amazing, given the contents of the book.”

Share [5]