<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The story of American Religious tolerance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dangerousintersection.org/2010/12/19/the-story-of-american-religious-tolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2010/12/19/the-story-of-american-religious-tolerance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-story-of-american-religious-tolerance&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-story-of-american-religious-tolerance</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Science, Religion, Media and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Razinha		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2010/12/19/the-story-of-american-religious-tolerance/comment-page-1/#comment-81649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Razinha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=15662#comment-81649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always had a problem with the word &#034;tolerance&#034; when used in the social sense and it wasn&#039;t until a couple of years ago that I realized it&#039;s because it implies superiority.  Like the people being tolerant can afford to because the tolerees can&#039;t help the way they are.  Perhaps that&#039;s unfair, as most people don&#039;t even know that&#039;s how the come off, but then these are the people asking what the harm is in displaying one of the sets of ten commandments.
 

 
I prefer &#034;acceptance&#034;.  One can still feel morally superior without seeming so. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve always had a problem with the word &quot;tolerance&quot; when used in the social sense and it wasn&#039;t until a couple of years ago that I realized it&#039;s because it implies superiority.  Like the people being tolerant can afford to because the tolerees can&#039;t help the way they are.  Perhaps that&#039;s unfair, as most people don&#039;t even know that&#039;s how the come off, but then these are the people asking what the harm is in displaying one of the sets of ten commandments.</p>
<p>I prefer &quot;acceptance&quot;.  One can still feel morally superior without seeming so. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>