<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether Corporations have the same First Amendment rights as individuals.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Science, Religion, Media and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:35:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erich Vieth		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-51120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erich Vieth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=8928#comment-51120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-51119&quot;&gt;Niklaus Pfirsig&lt;/a&gt;.

Niklaus: Maybe the U.S. Supreme Court will soon approve of marriages between natural persons and corporations. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-51119">Niklaus Pfirsig</a>.</p>
<p>Niklaus: Maybe the U.S. Supreme Court will soon approve of marriages between natural persons and corporations. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Niklaus Pfirsig		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-51119</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niklaus Pfirsig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=8928#comment-51119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Before long we may see Microsoft or ATT running for president. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before long we may see Microsoft or ATT running for president. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay Fraz		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-51032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Fraz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=8928#comment-51032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have long said that we have given them human rights, thus we must give them human punishments.
 

 
When corporations purposefully commit crimes, lets institute a &#039;incarcerations&#039; and &#039;death penalties&#039;. For minor infractions force the selling off of certain divisions involved. In serious cases all assets are broken up and sold to the highest bidder.
 

 
I dearly hope we do not lose this battle. Sometimes I feel impotent in dealing with these greed mongers and I wonder at what point would direct action be necessary. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long said that we have given them human rights, thus we must give them human punishments.</p>
<p>When corporations purposefully commit crimes, lets institute a &#039;incarcerations&#039; and &#039;death penalties&#039;. For minor infractions force the selling off of certain divisions involved. In serious cases all assets are broken up and sold to the highest bidder.</p>
<p>I dearly hope we do not lose this battle. Sometimes I feel impotent in dealing with these greed mongers and I wonder at what point would direct action be necessary. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Hogan		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2009/09/05/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-corporations-have-the-same-first-amendment-rights-as-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-51030</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hogan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 00:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=8928#comment-51030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many states have individual limits on corporate spending which have been upheld in the past. This case is just another where in the ordinary course of the Court it should be a loser for Big Business. The doctrine of &#034;stare decisis&#034; or &#034;let the decision stand&#034; should guide the Court to rule against Big Business.
 

 

 

 
But, the Roberts Court has yet to rule against business in any major decision yert. I expect another 5-4 decision, written by CJ Roberts, and that the fascist croporatists will win again. It will be another tortured decision somewhat like others where the Court claims to uphold precedent but, overturns decades of prior contrary jurisprudence. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many states have individual limits on corporate spending which have been upheld in the past. This case is just another where in the ordinary course of the Court it should be a loser for Big Business. The doctrine of &quot;stare decisis&quot; or &quot;let the decision stand&quot; should guide the Court to rule against Big Business.</p>
<p>But, the Roberts Court has yet to rule against business in any major decision yert. I expect another 5-4 decision, written by CJ Roberts, and that the fascist croporatists will win again. It will be another tortured decision somewhat like others where the Court claims to uphold precedent but, overturns decades of prior contrary jurisprudence. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>