<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ExxonMobil and the White House finally get it about global warming . . . NOT!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dangerousintersection.org/2007/02/09/exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2007/02/09/exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Science, Religion, Media and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Klarmann		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2007/02/09/exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not/comment-page-1/#comment-11603</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Klarmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1035#comment-11603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I did some exploring in that China-hosted site, and found that the guiding principles of the organization are to study ways to spread the word about the dangers of human-induced global warming.
 

 
In the name of scientific objectivity, I&#039;m concerned that their conclusion is specified in their founding charter papers, filed in 1998 before they did any research of their own.
 

 
Also, their charter says that no conclusions drawn by their researchers are official or to be released until approved by the board of the organization granting the charter. They are on &#034;our&#034; side, but the set-up sounds too similar to what is happening to White House chartered research. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some exploring in that China-hosted site, and found that the guiding principles of the organization are to study ways to spread the word about the dangers of human-induced global warming.</p>
<p>In the name of scientific objectivity, I&#039;m concerned that their conclusion is specified in their founding charter papers, filed in 1998 before they did any research of their own.</p>
<p>Also, their charter says that no conclusions drawn by their researchers are official or to be released until approved by the board of the organization granting the charter. They are on &quot;our&quot; side, but the set-up sounds too similar to what is happening to White House chartered research. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2007/02/09/exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not/comment-page-1/#comment-11602</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1035#comment-11602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This link to the international study has been making it&#039;s way around...
 

  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf&lt;/a&gt;  

 
Of course you have to be a scientist to understand it. Or do you? The graph of Global warming looks very similar to the Exxon stock. Up up up. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This link to the international study has been making it&#039;s way around&#8230;</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf</a>  </p>
<p>Of course you have to be a scientist to understand it. Or do you? The graph of Global warming looks very similar to the Exxon stock. Up up up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erich Vieth		</title>
		<link>https://dangerousintersection.org/2007/02/09/exxonmobil-and-the-white-house-finally-get-it-about-global-warming-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erich Vieth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1035#comment-9970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s more on ExxonMobil&#039;s hypocrisy. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/somebody-call-a-doctor-e_b_41238.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Click here.&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s more on ExxonMobil&#039;s hypocrisy. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/somebody-call-a-doctor-e_b_41238.html" rel="nofollow">Click here.</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>