This impressive speech suggests that the United States is not the “greatest country in the world.” But what would Jeff Daniels know? He’s only relying on facts.
Erich Vieth is an attorney focusing on consumer law litigation and appellate practice. He is also a working musician and a writer, having founded Dangerous Intersection in 2006. Erich and his wife, Anne Jay, live in the Shaw Neighborhood of St. Louis, Missouri, where they are raising their two extraordinary daughters.
Tough little video. Lots of it I liked very much (my favorite bit was when he barked out– ‘Yosemite?!’). Too funny. Also enjoyed the audience transfixed in stunned silence, as if they were collectively thinking, ‘Is he really allowed to say that? Aren’t we all supposed to robotically parrot the same patriotic mantra?’
For me it went off the boil slightly around the 2/3 mark (cue the music) when he stated,’We used to be, but…America is not the greatest country in the world anymore.’ Believing America was ever “the greatest country in the world” is just Bad Nostalgia (ooo, that would be a cool name for a tribute band!). Besides being completely meaningless without first operationally defining what is meant by “greatest”, it’s objectively just not a valid statement. The same arguments he made regarding other countries would still hold true at any period of the American empire since its birth in 1776. When the United States of America was supposedly “the greatest country”, what century or decade was he referring to I wonder? When was this Glory Era of golden American benevolence and righteousness? Didn’t exist–ever. The history of the United States is filled end to end with disgraceful horrors, inequality, genocide, and human rights abuses of such dark gravity that they are almost ineffable. Cheering for the Home Team or carying around delusions of a paradise that never existing may feel good and warmly poignant, but dealing with the hard facts of reality are ultimately a much more honest and authentic platform to rest upon.
It’s a game of comparative anatomy. You make a claim like that by looking at your competitors, and until the post WWII period certain of those metrics held true because what we’ve come to know as “liberal democracy” had very little purchase anywhere else in the world prior to that and nearly choked to death during the Great Depression. Standard of living was higher for a long time than almost anywhere else even on a bad day. And for a good part of the 20th century we had possibly the highest rate of technological and scientific innovation on the planet. Much of this was the fortune of history, but a lot of it had to do with the simple fact that a space was provided here for people coming from other places to do what they could not do there. Again, it’s a comparative thing, but it was never a myth that a huge portion of the planet wanted to come here because where they were was much, much worse—and that the majority of those people who came here willingly found even the destitution more tolerable.
We’ve lost that since the Cold War because we have become so damned afraid of tomorrow.
But “being the greatest country” is, as you say, an almost useless statement, only because it is so all-encompassing. I remember late-night bull sessions where the least little flaw was sufficient to claim that nothing America did was worth while, and that kind of exaggeration is just as meaningless but infinitely more destructive.
It is true that in order to do better, you need confidence, and that’s hard to do when half the country is steeped in guilt and the need to apologize for not being perfect and the other half sees any attempt to improve as an indictment for crimes they don’t feel were ever committed. Everyone is defensive and the longer than persists the worse we’ll do, because it’s an erosive condition. Erosive in the worst way—morally.
There’s a scene in the Robin Williams film “Moscow On The Hudson” where he enters his first American supermarket to find coffee and nearly has a meltdown at the very fact of what we take for granted. The system upon which that store is built has only recent presence in 90% of the rest of the world. We find it funny. Immigrants from the Third World do not.
We’ve been dismantling what made this country so worthwhile and it began in the Cold War when we began to distrust intellectuals who were not willing to make blanket condemnations of other ideologies and has continued apace because certain people learned that it was a good way to win elections. That erosion has damaged something that was real, not a myth, and I for one would very much like to see it back. There really was a time when “America” as an idea meant something to the rest of the world. It was a standard. But the standard of good was something we collectively assumed we could never lose and made fun of people who could only find bad things to talk about. As they made their case more effectively, we collectively questioned whether anything here was good. We set the stage thereby for a horribly destructive battle that it bringing us down.
Maybe this comes as surprise to some, that I’d be saying this, but there has been and still is much about this country that I love and the continual denigration of it does no good. We do not have to ignore the crap or pretend we have no problems in order to embrace the better parts of our heritage and acknowledge that all that freedom (however you wish to define it) and economic prosperity upon which it rests is relatively recent in the world and that at one time we were THE model for both. Hard to imagine, I know, but true nonetheless. There’s more to our history than Howard Zinn would have you think.
Mark: Points well taken and granted. It is important to consider the wonderful achievements of the United States, but also not to deny it’s murky past (and present).
What makes a country (or anything really) “great” is relative, ultimately subjective, and a matter of perspective when distilled down to it’s essence–a complex and inseperable relationship between observer and observed.
My post point, or position, was to be a small voice of opposition to the strident majority of “knee-jerk patriots”. The ‘America is the greatest, and has always been’ crowd. They are legion, quite vocal and I suspect ignorant of, or unwilling to confront, our country’s harsh truths and ugly histories. Why? Let’s face it, we all like to be on the winning team, part of a collective good, blessed at birth by a fortune of geography. It’s the sad old “Us vs. Them” game. Primitive territorial pissings– myopic and Ego-stained (my town is better than your town; my country is greater than your country; my God is stronger than your God). Here, in my opinion, lies your real “meaningless and infinitely more destructive” mentality.
Also, comparatively “high” standard of living, massive GNP, economic prosperity, and tech advances cannot whitewash or trump the virtual extermination of the Native Americans, atomic bombing of civilian cities, chemical warfare, racial discriminations and lynchings, covert wars and black ops, funding of mass murdering dictators and regimes, slaughter of innocents, etc. These events simply must enter into the discussion when throwing around proclamations of America being “the greatest country in the world.” By not addressing, or admitting to, the reality of America’s dark side, the “USA! USA!” cheerleaders are, perhaps unwittingly, giving our leaders license to continue with business as usual and allowing the forward thrust of America’s dark side to stab ever deeper into our collective futures.
“knee jerk patriots”—I call them lapel-pin patriots—don’t know why America is great, either. They work day and night to choke what has in the past been our strengths to death.
We don’t have to white-wash anything. The problem is either-or thinking on both sides. It’s natural to “take sides” but it’s also one of the biggest problems humanity has, because we tend to take a side in every damn thing when in most instances taking a side just destroys possibilities.
The flag-waving, sycophatic cheerleaders of America have no clue what made this country what it is, good or bad. They think just being able to brag about it is enough, all the while they defund, denigrate, and deny everything that might once more inform genuine greatness. They think things like the Civil Rights movement, women’s liberation, and gay rights were and are somehow detrimental to this country, when in fact those things are demonstrative of our greatness. But to have those things demands that we acknowledge the wrongs they redressed and we do that, too.
My response to you was that acknowledging the wrongs can overwhelm the possibility of a better tomorrow because it reaches a point where we deny that anything was ever right about us, and that’s just as big a mischaracterization.
I think the salient point is that simply proclaiming sonething does not make it true. Ignoring the problems won’t make them go away, but acknowledging the existence of problems is the first step in finding solutions.
There was a time when the US lead the way in Innovations in healthcare and in communications. There was a time when the US progressivel promotedequality for all, equal access to the judicial system and oportunity for everyone. The future was wide open.
That has been turned around by small minded greedy failed businessmen-turned-politician who are devout followers of a corrupt ideology.
I have a college degree, My younger son, who is an exceptional student will probably not attend college. First, because I can not afford it. Second, because the financial sector has perverted our post secondary educational system into nothing more than a new revenue stram for the richest of the rich, and third, many of the universities are becoming little more than very expensive diploma mills. This is not even considering the numerous “career” colleges promising degrees in medical coding and billing (in other words, filign insurance claims)
Why the decay?
Well, for all the bluster and BS about “Free market” and competition, we have neither in the US.
If you click on the Facebook icon (below) and send me (Erich Vieth) a FRIEND REQUEST, you'll receive updates to DI's newest articles. And, of course, RSS is available. DI's Twitter and Youtube links are also below.
Search Dangerous Intersection
Sponsor Ad
Sponsor Ad
Subscribe
Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.
Planetary Paul { Reminds me of a public lecture by a brain surgeon I attended long ago. He used a classification of the level of deterministic chaos in the brain from 0=dead to a maximum of 5 (I believe), which represents a perfectly healthy brain. Healthy because many situations require hair trigger response times and continuous adaptations, which would not be possible in a system only capable of strictly procedural responses. He used a mathematical procedure to analyse EEG's in order to derive the chaos level. During an epileptic seizure there would be a sudden drop and then a rebound to a normal high level of chaos. He theorised that the brain constantly checks itself and if it detects a dangerous drop in its chaos level, it may do a reset on itself in the form of a seizure. } – May 25, 12:35 AM
Ben { "truth of Catholic teaching" such as ... men have one more rib than women? http://biology.clc.uc.edu/courses/bio105/ribs.htm } – May 24, 9:15 PM
grumpypilgrim { One of the important points that the mainstream media has glossed over is that the reason why the IRS targeted groups with "tea party" and "freedom" in their names is that there had been a *history* of such groups not qualifying for tax exempt status. The IRS didn't pull those keywords out of a hat, nor did they choose them for political reasons. They chose them for the same reason that fishermen return to places where they have caught fish before: because that's where the fish are most likely to be found again. What's galling is that if the tables were turned (if liberal groups had been the targets), Republicans would be praising the IRS for making efficient use of public money (which is what Dems should be doing). } – May 24, 6:41 PM
Ben { You forgot to put the word "truth" in quotes (again). Since we are not talking about anything which could ever be falsified (tested) in 4.54 Billion years, it is a stretch of Biblical proportions to use the word Truth when describing Catholic teaching. This also applies to anything else that comes out of the Rectum of Man. } – May 24, 10:12 AM
Erich Vieth { Mike: Thank you for taking the time to articulate those thoughts. When I read Helen Keller's words I have been inspired and puzzled. I just don't get it. I don't get how she could have some a grasp on large social issues given what would seem to be a lack of necessary access to the rest of the world. And she was exceedingly outspoken in political ways, though her views would not be appreciated by conservatives. For instance, here. } – May 23, 10:39 PM
Mike Morris { I watched this video recently after reading Helen Keller's autobiography, which I thoroughly recommend to those few of us who missed it in grade school. She worked so hard to speak in an intelligible way while she was away from home for many weeks, and upon her return she surprised her family with this newly developed skill. I get chills just thinking about what that moment was like for those present. It is amazing to get a sense of the depth of her understanding of the world, that almost completely entered her consciousness through her fingers alone. It's tempting, but I can't use the word miraculous to describe it. Instead it is a mind-blowing testament to the human spirit. } – May 23, 10:17 PM
Tim Hogan { The death and resurrection of Jesus is the grace of God which saved us all. The good works we do allow for that grace to be manifest to all. All are saved, http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/04/28/catholic-di-author-weighs-in-on-salvation/ I wrote on this years ago, and through God's grace and prayer, Frances has also made salvation for ALL known as a truth of Catholic teaching. Thank you, Holiness! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/22/pope-francis-good-atheists_n_3320757.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular } – May 23, 2:44 PM
richard { Greetings, The history of the catholic church is that when finding "middle ground" with them. You will be the one that will have to give up ground, not them. On the outside it may look and sound likethey "lower" the bar. But the roman catholic church is the same as she was during the middle "dark" ages. SHE is the mother church you will have to work on HER terms. } – May 23, 1:18 AM
Erich Vieth { Ken Miller explains the "missing chromosome" of humans in this 4-minute video: } – May 23, 12:37 AM
Planetary Paul { Very interesting, a fractal universe of lies } – May 20, 4:21 AM
Planetary Paul { Did me think of a documentary on leopards in India I saw the other day. There are lots of leopards in India; whereas tigers are very unsuccessful nowadays, leopards do (somewhat) better. In some states this poses no problem at all. People know how to coexist with leopards and catastrophic interactions with humans are very rare indeed. Even people sleeping outdoors are left alone (children sleep between adults). In other states leopards go after humans, why? Turns out that when leopards are hunted, they turn on their hunters. When a rural province decided that leopards were dangerous and had to be eradicated from the environment, deaths by leopard spiked big time and the number of leopards didn't diminish. For every one killed another one took it's place, with a vengeance. The new arrival will tend to be less familiar with the territory handed to it and will see anything of... } – May 20, 3:39 AM
Erich Vieth { Grumpy, I think I agree. Once one declares something to be "sacred," it cannot be questioned. Hence, when people declare a book full of self-contradictions to be absolutely and completely true, this compels them to proceed to tie themselves into pretzels justifying the book. One philosopher called theology "tennis without a net." } – May 18, 10:19 PM
grumpypilgrim { Rami said, "It’s simple, read both books and decide which makes more sense...." Alas, it's not that simple. Reading just two books will not reveal the truth on a subject as abstract as that contained in self-proclaimed holy books. Indeed, thousands of books have been written to supplement our many holy books and yet nothing (beyond secular history) has been proven to be true in any of them. Moreover, the supernatural claims made in "scriptures" can be found, virtually without exception, in earlier texts, raising the question of whether any of it was "revealed" by a divine deity or merely adopted from earlier popular stories. Accordingly, "read both books and decide which makes more sense" merely sidesteps the possibility that both are mere fictional nonsense. } – May 18, 2:38 PM
grumpypilgrim { One would think that the right-to-life folks would be all in favor of effective and affordable family planning, including both contraceptives and public school sex education, because they are important ways to reduce unintended pregnancies, but often the same folks are against all of it. } – May 17, 6:54 PM
grumpypilgrim { After puzzling over the question of why so many (Southern Baptist) Christian evangelicals claim to believe so many idiotic things, and why they become so outraged when those beliefs are disputed, I have come up with a possible answer: their behavior stems from trying to cover up one lie with another. Their first lie is that the Bible is literally true. Once they assert that lie, they then must resort to ever more absurd lies to sustain the original. Whether it's suggesting that the moon is a source of light or rejecting the evidence for Darwinian evolution, the lie that the Bible is literally true paints them into a corner from which their only exist is to invent more lies. It's almost like the movie, 'Fargo', where one misguided plan becomes the starting point for many more, until, inevitably, the whole scheme cartwheels out of control. } – May 17, 6:47 PM
Rami { @LaM Jack: It's simple, read both books and decide which makes more sense. Is Jesus the son of god and should you play to saints like catholics do? Which makes more sense, Jesus is a human or that god decided to have a child with a human woman? } – May 16, 12:33 AM
grumpypilgrim { Stockman claims, "The Republican Party is basically irrelevant to the economic crisis that faces the country." He's wrong. The Republican Party is not "irrelevant" to the economic crisis that faces the country: it *caused* the economic crisis. } – May 15, 4:50 PM
Erich Vieth { And from this research from Washington University, an effective way to reduce the number of abortions is to make birth control accessible. Common sense and undeniable: http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/24334.aspx } – May 12, 11:06 PM
grumpypilgrim { One disturbing aspect of those time-lapse photos is that for each one of those locations, there are countless other locations where the human-caused destruction occurred so long ago that we do not have physical records (even though the changes are just as extensive). } – May 10, 5:36 PM
Erich Vieth { "The US military has done its best to erect a wall of secrecy around the court-martial trial of Bradley Manning, easily one of the most important trials on whistleblowers and espionage laws in many years. This week, the military judge not only permitted numerous witnesses to testify in secret but also ordered a "dry run" of parts of the trial to be held in secret as well, a move even military prosecutors acknowledged was "unprecedented". Legal proceedings demanding greater transparency brought by the Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of several journalists and activists (including myself) have been rejected by military courts." http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/09/hawking-israel-manning-transparency-fcc } – May 09, 11:57 PM
grumpypilgrim { To watch an excellent debate about the war on drugs, see this PBS program: http://www.pbs.org/programs/intelligence-squared-debates/. The 'Intelligence Squared' PBS series also has several other worthwhile debates, which you can link to from the above page. } – May 07, 6:24 PM
Jim Razinha { Check out John McWhorter's Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold History of English. } – May 06, 9:20 PM
grumpypilgrim { Years ago, I saw a guest on a talk show who pulled random people out of the audience and guessed where they were from, based on how they pronounced just two or three words that he selected. His indicator words included pairs such as "marry" vs "merry," and "roof" vs "rough." He was amazingly accurate, in come cases placing the person within 50 miles of where they lived. In a couple of cases, his guesses were wildly off until the people admitted that they had grown up in the area he had guessed but no longer lived there. Interesting sidebar: there is a little-known field of science known as forensic linguistics that uses linguistic traits to try to solve crimes. In one case, an expert in this field was able to pinpoint the home city of a criminal on the basis of terminology the criminal had used in a ransom... } – May 06, 3:58 PM
Mike M. { Ugh. An ugly stew of stereotypes and sweeping, oversimplified assumptions. There is no such thing as a typical American. There are only individual humans, with all their variety, quirks, beauty, ugliness, ignorance and brilliance found everywhere spread across the planet regardless of the piece of land they happen to occupy at the moment. } – May 04, 7:24 PM
Tough little video. Lots of it I liked very much (my favorite bit was when he barked out– ‘Yosemite?!’). Too funny. Also enjoyed the audience transfixed in stunned silence, as if they were collectively thinking, ‘Is he really allowed to say that? Aren’t we all supposed to robotically parrot the same patriotic mantra?’
For me it went off the boil slightly around the 2/3 mark (cue the music) when he stated,’We used to be, but…America is not the greatest country in the world anymore.’ Believing America was ever “the greatest country in the world” is just Bad Nostalgia (ooo, that would be a cool name for a tribute band!). Besides being completely meaningless without first operationally defining what is meant by “greatest”, it’s objectively just not a valid statement. The same arguments he made regarding other countries would still hold true at any period of the American empire since its birth in 1776. When the United States of America was supposedly “the greatest country”, what century or decade was he referring to I wonder? When was this Glory Era of golden American benevolence and righteousness? Didn’t exist–ever. The history of the United States is filled end to end with disgraceful horrors, inequality, genocide, and human rights abuses of such dark gravity that they are almost ineffable. Cheering for the Home Team or carying around delusions of a paradise that never existing may feel good and warmly poignant, but dealing with the hard facts of reality are ultimately a much more honest and authentic platform to rest upon.
Mike,
It’s a game of comparative anatomy. You make a claim like that by looking at your competitors, and until the post WWII period certain of those metrics held true because what we’ve come to know as “liberal democracy” had very little purchase anywhere else in the world prior to that and nearly choked to death during the Great Depression. Standard of living was higher for a long time than almost anywhere else even on a bad day. And for a good part of the 20th century we had possibly the highest rate of technological and scientific innovation on the planet. Much of this was the fortune of history, but a lot of it had to do with the simple fact that a space was provided here for people coming from other places to do what they could not do there. Again, it’s a comparative thing, but it was never a myth that a huge portion of the planet wanted to come here because where they were was much, much worse—and that the majority of those people who came here willingly found even the destitution more tolerable.
We’ve lost that since the Cold War because we have become so damned afraid of tomorrow.
But “being the greatest country” is, as you say, an almost useless statement, only because it is so all-encompassing. I remember late-night bull sessions where the least little flaw was sufficient to claim that nothing America did was worth while, and that kind of exaggeration is just as meaningless but infinitely more destructive.
It is true that in order to do better, you need confidence, and that’s hard to do when half the country is steeped in guilt and the need to apologize for not being perfect and the other half sees any attempt to improve as an indictment for crimes they don’t feel were ever committed. Everyone is defensive and the longer than persists the worse we’ll do, because it’s an erosive condition. Erosive in the worst way—morally.
There’s a scene in the Robin Williams film “Moscow On The Hudson” where he enters his first American supermarket to find coffee and nearly has a meltdown at the very fact of what we take for granted. The system upon which that store is built has only recent presence in 90% of the rest of the world. We find it funny. Immigrants from the Third World do not.
We’ve been dismantling what made this country so worthwhile and it began in the Cold War when we began to distrust intellectuals who were not willing to make blanket condemnations of other ideologies and has continued apace because certain people learned that it was a good way to win elections. That erosion has damaged something that was real, not a myth, and I for one would very much like to see it back. There really was a time when “America” as an idea meant something to the rest of the world. It was a standard. But the standard of good was something we collectively assumed we could never lose and made fun of people who could only find bad things to talk about. As they made their case more effectively, we collectively questioned whether anything here was good. We set the stage thereby for a horribly destructive battle that it bringing us down.
Maybe this comes as surprise to some, that I’d be saying this, but there has been and still is much about this country that I love and the continual denigration of it does no good. We do not have to ignore the crap or pretend we have no problems in order to embrace the better parts of our heritage and acknowledge that all that freedom (however you wish to define it) and economic prosperity upon which it rests is relatively recent in the world and that at one time we were THE model for both. Hard to imagine, I know, but true nonetheless. There’s more to our history than Howard Zinn would have you think.
Mark: Points well taken and granted. It is important to consider the wonderful achievements of the United States, but also not to deny it’s murky past (and present).
What makes a country (or anything really) “great” is relative, ultimately subjective, and a matter of perspective when distilled down to it’s essence–a complex and inseperable relationship between observer and observed.
My post point, or position, was to be a small voice of opposition to the strident majority of “knee-jerk patriots”. The ‘America is the greatest, and has always been’ crowd. They are legion, quite vocal and I suspect ignorant of, or unwilling to confront, our country’s harsh truths and ugly histories. Why? Let’s face it, we all like to be on the winning team, part of a collective good, blessed at birth by a fortune of geography. It’s the sad old “Us vs. Them” game. Primitive territorial pissings– myopic and Ego-stained (my town is better than your town; my country is greater than your country; my God is stronger than your God). Here, in my opinion, lies your real “meaningless and infinitely more destructive” mentality.
Also, comparatively “high” standard of living, massive GNP, economic prosperity, and tech advances cannot whitewash or trump the virtual extermination of the Native Americans, atomic bombing of civilian cities, chemical warfare, racial discriminations and lynchings, covert wars and black ops, funding of mass murdering dictators and regimes, slaughter of innocents, etc. These events simply must enter into the discussion when throwing around proclamations of America being “the greatest country in the world.” By not addressing, or admitting to, the reality of America’s dark side, the “USA! USA!” cheerleaders are, perhaps unwittingly, giving our leaders license to continue with business as usual and allowing the forward thrust of America’s dark side to stab ever deeper into our collective futures.
Mike,
“knee jerk patriots”—I call them lapel-pin patriots—don’t know why America is great, either. They work day and night to choke what has in the past been our strengths to death.
We don’t have to white-wash anything. The problem is either-or thinking on both sides. It’s natural to “take sides” but it’s also one of the biggest problems humanity has, because we tend to take a side in every damn thing when in most instances taking a side just destroys possibilities.
The flag-waving, sycophatic cheerleaders of America have no clue what made this country what it is, good or bad. They think just being able to brag about it is enough, all the while they defund, denigrate, and deny everything that might once more inform genuine greatness. They think things like the Civil Rights movement, women’s liberation, and gay rights were and are somehow detrimental to this country, when in fact those things are demonstrative of our greatness. But to have those things demands that we acknowledge the wrongs they redressed and we do that, too.
My response to you was that acknowledging the wrongs can overwhelm the possibility of a better tomorrow because it reaches a point where we deny that anything was ever right about us, and that’s just as big a mischaracterization.
That’s all.
Markwt;
I think the salient point is that simply proclaiming sonething does not make it true. Ignoring the problems won’t make them go away, but acknowledging the existence of problems is the first step in finding solutions.
There was a time when the US lead the way in Innovations in healthcare and in communications. There was a time when the US progressivel promotedequality for all, equal access to the judicial system and oportunity for everyone. The future was wide open.
That has been turned around by small minded greedy failed businessmen-turned-politician who are devout followers of a corrupt ideology.
I have a college degree, My younger son, who is an exceptional student will probably not attend college. First, because I can not afford it. Second, because the financial sector has perverted our post secondary educational system into nothing more than a new revenue stram for the richest of the rich, and third, many of the universities are becoming little more than very expensive diploma mills. This is not even considering the numerous “career” colleges promising degrees in medical coding and billing (in other words, filign insurance claims)
Why the decay?
Well, for all the bluster and BS about “Free market” and competition, we have neither in the US.