Archive for November 20th, 2011
Occupy the Moment is on the air
A few weeks ago, I covered an event by the St. Louis Occupy protest, interviewing many of the protesters. One of these protesters (named “Matt”) has (along with “Mark”) created a website called Occupy the Moment, which is “Podcasting in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street.”
I just finished listening to the Episode 3 podcast (more than an hour in length), and was encouraged to hear extensive intelligent, well-informed and self-critical analysis regarding Occupy protests, both in St. Louis and nationwide. The first 40-minutes of Episode 3 concerned the Occupy movement.
Listening to this podcast, I heard that some protesters are charging that at least some St. Louis police officers are obscuring the names on their badges or even displaying false names. The hosts do recognize that the St. Louis Police Department has generally shown admirable restraint regarding the St. Louis protesters.
From the same podcast I also learned that last week the Manhattan police (apparently illegally) seized a Wikileaks donation truck. I’ve heard that J.P. Morgan/Chase donated more than $4 Million to the New York Police Department shortly before the Department evicted protesters from Zucotti Park. I heard the hosts discuss other substantial collaborations between large corporations and law enforcement. The hosts also commented at length on the recent and obviously coordinated simultaneous evictions of protesters nationwide.
Matt and Mark voice many well-considered opinions regarding the motives and methods of the Occupy protests and the oftentimes disappointing response to these protests by law enforcement agencies and the national media. The podcast covers issues raised by particular Occupy protests in many locations across the country. Once they finish discussing the Occupy movement, the hosts moved on to discuss other issues, including hot issues regarding intellectual property.
Based on Podcast 3, I plan to periodically return to Occupy the Moment to hear further insights regarding the Occupy movement, in St. Louis and beyond.
Capitalism v Crony Capitalism
Occupy protesters have been mischaracterized by many people as being opposed to “capitalism.” Based on my conversations and observations, I have not encountered protesters who oppose “capitalism.” Rather, they oppose what has been described as “crony capitalism.” Compare the follow definitions, from Wikipedia:
Capitalism is an economic system that became dominant in the Western world following the demise of feudalism. There is no consensus on the precise definition nor on how the term should be used as a historical category. There is general agreement that elements of capitalism include private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit, competitive markets, and wage labor. The designation is applied to a variety of historical cases, varying in time, geography, politics and culture.
In the above definition, you won’t see, as an element of capitalism, that players are allowed to rig the system. Compare to Crony capitalism:
Crony capitalism is a term describing a capitalist economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, and so forth. Crony capitalism is believed to arise when political cronyism spills over into the business world; self-serving friendships and family ties between businessmen and the government influence the economy and society to the extent that it corrupts public-serving economic and political ideals.
The ways in which First Amendment expression is morphing into “disorderly conduct”
In his article published at The Atlantic, Alexis Madrigal urges us to refrain from villainizing police officer John Pike and, instead, consider that his actions an illustration of change in the systematic police plan for responding to protest movements.
UC Davis Chancellor Katehi makes her silent exit
One of the comments at this youtube video says it all: “Of course it was peaceful. The ones causing violence were not there: the cops.”
More and more, we are seeing a militarization of urban police forces–America’s military weapons and tactics turned toward her own people who are exercising their First Amendment rights.
Facebook attacks
New tactic to censor Facebook posts by those on the political right, according to Segway Jeremy Ryan:
People are suppressing information in Wisconsin by actively reporting people they deem to be a threat on Facebook. I myself have been reported and banned for one to three days for simply posting “Good job” or “The majority of Wisconsin doesn’t like Scott Walker.” People have been reported on pages for saying nothing more than my name and have been reprimanded by Facebook. The strategy is simple and Facebook lets it continue. If someone reports something as abusive to Facebook they don’t actually look at it, they just remove it and warn the person who posted it. If you get enough you are not able to dispute them at all, and with no admin contacts and no one at Facebook actually looking at the posts reported as “abusive,” the person gets blocked.
A new Declaration for America: to wake up from its delusions
With the help of a DI reader who wishes to remain anonymous, I have created the following Declaration for modern Americans to wake up from their delusions. I’d recommend that all adults and school children put their hands over their hearts in the morning and say the following instead of pledging allegiance to the powers-that-be (but see here for an alternate form of the Pledge).
} – 
Connect with Dangerous Intersection
If you click on the Facebook icon (below) and send me (Erich Vieth) a FRIEND REQUEST, you'll receive updates to DI's newest articles. And, of course, RSS is available. DI's Twitter and Youtube links are also below.