<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juries for all occasions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/06/13/juries-for-all-occasions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/06/13/juries-for-all-occasions/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/06/13/juries-for-all-occasions/comment-page-1/#comment-42561</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=7472#comment-42561</guid>
		<description>Very insightful Erich, thanks for the glimpse into this aspect of the legal world. It does remind me that I too want this kind of truth speak regarding the blind spots in my life that I don't want to face. 

Though a hotline would be handy, personally I think the solution lies in good friends. You know, those ones who love you through and through, and love you so much that they would rather be honest and hurt you than commit "confirmation bias" in the name of being nice. They'll tell you when you have a booger hanging out because better be embarrassed by them than a roomful of strangers. Or they'll be honest about the more serious stuff, like if they notice you're being too passive with your family or impatient with people.

I have about two people like this in my life, and one is my wife. However, even she falls short when it comes to our relationship, we both occasionally have blinders on in that. I'd love to have more people like that in my life.

Which reminds me of why I like this blog and the community of authors/commenters. I've been chastised more than once, and usually for all the right reasons. I've been stung by having my latent bias against gay marriage exposed in a past post by Hank. However, I've lately come around to accepting the idea. I wanted to say that because our/my views are so infrequently moved especially on hot button issues. But free thought forums like this can have a positive effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful Erich, thanks for the glimpse into this aspect of the legal world. It does remind me that I too want this kind of truth speak regarding the blind spots in my life that I don&#8217;t want to face. </p>
<p>Though a hotline would be handy, personally I think the solution lies in good friends. You know, those ones who love you through and through, and love you so much that they would rather be honest and hurt you than commit &#8220;confirmation bias&#8221; in the name of being nice. They&#8217;ll tell you when you have a booger hanging out because better be embarrassed by them than a roomful of strangers. Or they&#8217;ll be honest about the more serious stuff, like if they notice you&#8217;re being too passive with your family or impatient with people.</p>
<p>I have about two people like this in my life, and one is my wife. However, even she falls short when it comes to our relationship, we both occasionally have blinders on in that. I&#8217;d love to have more people like that in my life.</p>
<p>Which reminds me of why I like this blog and the community of authors/commenters. I&#8217;ve been chastised more than once, and usually for all the right reasons. I&#8217;ve been stung by having my latent bias against gay marriage exposed in a past post by Hank. However, I&#8217;ve lately come around to accepting the idea. I wanted to say that because our/my views are so infrequently moved especially on hot button issues. But free thought forums like this can have a positive effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika Price</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/06/13/juries-for-all-occasions/comment-page-1/#comment-42219</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=7472#comment-42219</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that your firm uses samples from temp agencies- temp agencies are occasionally used to add to a subject pool in social science experiments. It's a convenient, if expensive way to bring in a wide array of people. 

Your post reminds me of my experience in high school debate. I used to live for the debate team- I believe I learned how to write and how to think from the experience. The most instructive part was the fact that a debater could not choose the side of an issue they wanted to defend. To compete, a debater had to prepare a case for both sides- a coin was flipped at the beginning of the debate to decide which competitor would take which side.

I had to prepare two cases that were equally strong, but that reached completely opposing conclusions. This forced me to consider the flaws in every argument- I was not just trying to bolster my own case, I had to become my own best opponent. It still helps me see the flaws in my own logic or the holes in my writing to this day.  

Persuasion is nothing without a sincere attempt to challenge and refute one's own message. We must always strive to poke holes in our own logic, both to protect ourselves from presenting a shoddy argument, and to ensure that we are drawing the right conclusions. It is very difficult to tear away our own self-service and admit to the flaws in our arguments- and I agree with you that the best way to refute oneself is to take the perspective of one's opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that your firm uses samples from temp agencies- temp agencies are occasionally used to add to a subject pool in social science experiments. It&#8217;s a convenient, if expensive way to bring in a wide array of people. </p>
<p>Your post reminds me of my experience in high school debate. I used to live for the debate team- I believe I learned how to write and how to think from the experience. The most instructive part was the fact that a debater could not choose the side of an issue they wanted to defend. To compete, a debater had to prepare a case for both sides- a coin was flipped at the beginning of the debate to decide which competitor would take which side.</p>
<p>I had to prepare two cases that were equally strong, but that reached completely opposing conclusions. This forced me to consider the flaws in every argument- I was not just trying to bolster my own case, I had to become my own best opponent. It still helps me see the flaws in my own logic or the holes in my writing to this day.  </p>
<p>Persuasion is nothing without a sincere attempt to challenge and refute one&#8217;s own message. We must always strive to poke holes in our own logic, both to protect ourselves from presenting a shoddy argument, and to ensure that we are drawing the right conclusions. It is very difficult to tear away our own self-service and admit to the flaws in our arguments- and I agree with you that the best way to refute oneself is to take the perspective of one&#8217;s opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
