<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How undependable are the experts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/03/26/how-undependable-are-the-experts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/03/26/how-undependable-are-the-experts/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niklaus Pfirsig</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/03/26/how-undependable-are-the-experts/comment-page-1/#comment-37407</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklaus Pfirsig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=5715#comment-37407</guid>
		<description>I think meteorologists may be considered more accurate that any of the others, since they base their forecasts on a statistical analysis of regional conditions and historical data. Which is why the forecasts list probabilities for rain, instead of saying that it will rain. Part of the problem is that the general population, from being mentally numbed by a steady diet of video games and "reality" TV programming, are not capable on understanding statistical theory. The lack of understanding is used and abused by those with an agenda.

  Many of the experts are simply no better than the hair tonic salesman in "Sweeney Todd"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think meteorologists may be considered more accurate that any of the others, since they base their forecasts on a statistical analysis of regional conditions and historical data. Which is why the forecasts list probabilities for rain, instead of saying that it will rain. Part of the problem is that the general population, from being mentally numbed by a steady diet of video games and &#8220;reality&#8221; TV programming, are not capable on understanding statistical theory. The lack of understanding is used and abused by those with an agenda.</p>
<p>  Many of the experts are simply no better than the hair tonic salesman in &#8220;Sweeney Todd&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
