<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DI is still under construction, but now there&#8217;s artwork in our header</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: projektleiterin</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35296</link>
		<dc:creator>projektleiterin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35296</guid>
		<description>I also don't like this moving thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also don&#8217;t like this moving thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35294</guid>
		<description>I am not a fan of the moving text. Anyone else as turned-off by it as me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a fan of the moving text. Anyone else as turned-off by it as me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich Vieth</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35293</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Vieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35293</guid>
		<description>Dan: Check out Erika's resources, 3 comments above.  Also consider my earlier post on story about a Dutch traffic engineer who made a town safer by making the people feel unsafe (by removing lots of traffic signage).
http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/09/18/dangerous-safety-signs/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan: Check out Erika&#8217;s resources, 3 comments above.  Also consider my earlier post on story about a Dutch traffic engineer who made a town safer by making the people feel unsafe (by removing lots of traffic signage).<br />
<a href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/09/18/dangerous-safety-signs/" rel="nofollow">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/09/18/dangerous-safety-signs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Klarmann</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35291</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Klarmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35291</guid>
		<description>This town is renowned for its excess of 4-way stops. Three of the few 2-way stops left in my residential neighborhood when I moved in are now 4-way. These are at intersections between unarguably minor vs. unarguably primary streets.

Why? Because people have become so used to rolling through 4-way stops with no one waiting that they also roll right through the subordinate direction of 2-way stops. Then there is an oops, and someone tries to sue the city not protecting them from their own stupidity.

Personally, I would prefer removing stop signs and creating more intersections at which people actually have to stop to see if it is safe. I've read that where this has been tried, accidents decreased. Can anyone find this citation? I couldn't, on short notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This town is renowned for its excess of 4-way stops. Three of the few 2-way stops left in my residential neighborhood when I moved in are now 4-way. These are at intersections between unarguably minor vs. unarguably primary streets.</p>
<p>Why? Because people have become so used to rolling through 4-way stops with no one waiting that they also roll right through the subordinate direction of 2-way stops. Then there is an oops, and someone tries to sue the city not protecting them from their own stupidity.</p>
<p>Personally, I would prefer removing stop signs and creating more intersections at which people actually have to stop to see if it is safe. I&#8217;ve read that where this has been tried, accidents decreased. Can anyone find this citation? I couldn&#8217;t, on short notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich Vieth</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35286</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Vieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35286</guid>
		<description>Erika: Great connections and, yes, poetic too. 

That was exactly the idea I had when I started this blog: that we need to deal directly with the topics that seem "dangerous."  It's much more dangerous to avoid the dangerous intersections.  And if you have the courage to enter, you will naturally be inclined to enter with some care because they seem dangerous--and you'll likely emerge at least OK, and probably better off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erika: Great connections and, yes, poetic too. </p>
<p>That was exactly the idea I had when I started this blog: that we need to deal directly with the topics that seem &#8220;dangerous.&#8221;  It&#8217;s much more dangerous to avoid the dangerous intersections.  And if you have the courage to enter, you will naturally be inclined to enter with some care because they seem dangerous&#8211;and you&#8217;ll likely emerge at least OK, and probably better off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika Price</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35284</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35284</guid>
		<description>I've read two books (Suburban Nation by Andres Duany and Traffic by Tom Vanderbilt) that claim the dangerous-looking intersections are much safer than regular intersections, because they demand a driver to be alert and careful. The traditional intersections have far more accidents, because they lend themselves to drivers' laziness. 

Kind of poetic, don't you think? The daunting, scary topics that make many feeble minds shy away are the very topics that save us. It is the mundane, the lazy contentment that comes from the safe and predictable that spells our doom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read two books (Suburban Nation by Andres Duany and Traffic by Tom Vanderbilt) that claim the dangerous-looking intersections are much safer than regular intersections, because they demand a driver to be alert and careful. The traditional intersections have far more accidents, because they lend themselves to drivers&#8217; laziness. </p>
<p>Kind of poetic, don&#8217;t you think? The daunting, scary topics that make many feeble minds shy away are the very topics that save us. It is the mundane, the lazy contentment that comes from the safe and predictable that spells our doom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklaus Pfirsig</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2009/02/02/di-is-still-under-construction-but-now-theres-artwork-in-our-header/comment-page-1/#comment-35267</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklaus Pfirsig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=4634#comment-35267</guid>
		<description>When I was a college student at Tennessee Technological University, there was a very similar 5-way intersection just off campus that the students called "Malfunction Junction". 

A few months ago, i visited an old friend that lives near the campus, we drove to the campus so I could see how it had changed over the years. I noticed that Malfunction Junction had been replaced by a traffic circle. I am not a fan of traffic circles, but in this case it was an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a college student at Tennessee Technological University, there was a very similar 5-way intersection just off campus that the students called &#8220;Malfunction Junction&#8221;. </p>
<p>A few months ago, i visited an old friend that lives near the campus, we drove to the campus so I could see how it had changed over the years. I noticed that Malfunction Junction had been replaced by a traffic circle. I am not a fan of traffic circles, but in this case it was an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
