<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campbell Brown&#8217;s warning about parity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/10/04/campbell-browns-warning-about-parity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/10/04/campbell-browns-warning-about-parity/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niklaus Pfirsig</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/10/04/campbell-browns-warning-about-parity/comment-page-1/#comment-26870</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklaus Pfirsig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=3220#comment-26870</guid>
		<description>This sunny/cloudy day argument is so idiotic. What if the two politicians and Ms. Brown are on a phone teleconferences. Now lets say that Ms Brown is in Seattle, Politician A is in Bangor and Politician B is in Phoenix. Politician A says it's raining, politician B says it sunny and they aren't lying. Ms Brown sees rain outside the studios and declares Politician A to be right. Viewers watching the show in Las Vegas probably realize they are all talking about local condition and probably think Ms. Brown is making a joke. 

This is because the viewers still have a credible sources of information for a different point of view. They can look out their own windows and decide for themselves.

However, when the only source of information is through the media, then for a reporter to withhold vital information is not only very irresponsible, but changes the information from news to opinion and propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sunny/cloudy day argument is so idiotic. What if the two politicians and Ms. Brown are on a phone teleconferences. Now lets say that Ms Brown is in Seattle, Politician A is in Bangor and Politician B is in Phoenix. Politician A says it&#8217;s raining, politician B says it sunny and they aren&#8217;t lying. Ms Brown sees rain outside the studios and declares Politician A to be right. Viewers watching the show in Las Vegas probably realize they are all talking about local condition and probably think Ms. Brown is making a joke. </p>
<p>This is because the viewers still have a credible sources of information for a different point of view. They can look out their own windows and decide for themselves.</p>
<p>However, when the only source of information is through the media, then for a reporter to withhold vital information is not only very irresponsible, but changes the information from news to opinion and propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
