<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just What is Intelligent Design?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/05/02/just-what-is-intelligent-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/05/02/just-what-is-intelligent-design/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erich Vieth</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/05/02/just-what-is-intelligent-design/#comment-18667</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Vieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=2531#comment-18667</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;The researchers polled a random sample of nearly 2000 high-school science teachers across the US in 2007. Of the 939 who responded, 2% said they did not cover evolution at all, with the majority spending between 3 and 10 classroom hours on the subject.

However, a quarter of the teachers also reported spending at least some time teaching about creationism or intelligent design. Of these, 48% – about 12.5% of the total survey – said they taught it as a "valid, scientific alternative to Darwinian explanations for the origin of species".&lt;/blockquote&gt;



http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/dn13930-16-of-us-science-teachers-are-creationists.html?feedId=online-news_rss20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The researchers polled a random sample of nearly 2000 high-school science teachers across the US in 2007. Of the 939 who responded, 2% said they did not cover evolution at all, with the majority spending between 3 and 10 classroom hours on the subject.</p>
<p>However, a quarter of the teachers also reported spending at least some time teaching about creationism or intelligent design. Of these, 48% – about 12.5% of the total survey – said they taught it as a &#8220;valid, scientific alternative to Darwinian explanations for the origin of species&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/dn13930-16-of-us-science-teachers-are-creationists.html?feedId=online-news_rss20" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/dn13930-16-of-us-science-teachers-are-creationists.html?feedId=online-news_rss20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/05/02/just-what-is-intelligent-design/#comment-18140</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=2531#comment-18140</guid>
		<description>Here is a video from the NCSE about how the eye evolved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOtP7HEuDYA

I found it at a great website:

www.ExpelledExposed.com

You really should try it, Dan.

:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a video from the NCSE about how the eye evolved.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOtP7HEuDYA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOtP7HEuDYA</a></p>
<p>I found it at a great website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ExpelledExposed.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ExpelledExposed.com</a></p>
<p>You really should try it, Dan.</p>
<p> <img src='http://dangerousintersection.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
