<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darwin&#8217;s impressive legacy in a nutshell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/04/06/darwins-impressive-legacy-in-a-nutshell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/04/06/darwins-impressive-legacy-in-a-nutshell/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: grumpypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/04/06/darwins-impressive-legacy-in-a-nutshell/#comment-17483</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 02:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/04/06/darwins-impressive-legacy-in-a-nutshell/#comment-17483</guid>
		<description>Anyone who disputes Darwin's theories should read his books.  In both the Origin of Species and Descent of Man, Darwin lays out compelling arguments that are exceedingly difficult to contradict, much less dismiss.  That's the reason his books and ideas were so earth-shaking:  they're very, very strong, and he anticipated (and dispatched) most of the contrary arguments that would be raised against him.  Not for nothing has he been seen as a major threat to creationism for the past century and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who disputes Darwin&#8217;s theories should read his books.  In both the Origin of Species and Descent of Man, Darwin lays out compelling arguments that are exceedingly difficult to contradict, much less dismiss.  That&#8217;s the reason his books and ideas were so earth-shaking:  they&#8217;re very, very strong, and he anticipated (and dispatched) most of the contrary arguments that would be raised against him.  Not for nothing has he been seen as a major threat to creationism for the past century and a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
