<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Before We Congratulate Ourselves On Our Tolerance and Maturity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erika Price</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/#comment-17297</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/#comment-17297</guid>
		<description>Also of note (as mentioned in one of my favorite podcasts, the Skeptic's Guide to the Universe): the silly reporting this piece of "news" has met. Many news sources have referred to this situation as "Pregnant Man Confuses Medical Community", or some variation like that. This amounts to dishonest, or at least sloppy, journalism. It comes as no surprise to the medical community that a FtM* transsexual who still has a working vagina and uterus, who stops taking his hormones can become pregnant. These doctors did react boorishly, it sounds like, but by no means did something inexplicable happen- like a biological male getting pregnant. 

*Female-to-male</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also of note (as mentioned in one of my favorite podcasts, the Skeptic&#8217;s Guide to the Universe): the silly reporting this piece of &#8220;news&#8221; has met. Many news sources have referred to this situation as &#8220;Pregnant Man Confuses Medical Community&#8221;, or some variation like that. This amounts to dishonest, or at least sloppy, journalism. It comes as no surprise to the medical community that a FtM* transsexual who still has a working vagina and uterus, who stops taking his hormones can become pregnant. These doctors did react boorishly, it sounds like, but by no means did something inexplicable happen- like a biological male getting pregnant. </p>
<p>*Female-to-male</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/#comment-17250</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/#comment-17250</guid>
		<description>"But it makes me wonder whether the FCC would get bent out of shape if “he” exposed one of his nipples at a Superbowl."

Indeed, there might also be the matter of breast feeding....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But it makes me wonder whether the FCC would get bent out of shape if “he” exposed one of his nipples at a Superbowl.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, there might also be the matter of breast feeding&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich Vieth</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/#comment-17249</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Vieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/03/28/before-we-congratulate-ourselves-on-our-tolerance-and-majurity/#comment-17249</guid>
		<description>I'm happy for the pregnant dude. Truly. 

But it makes me wonder whether the FCC would get bent out of shape if "he" exposed one of his nipples at a Superbowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy for the pregnant dude. Truly. </p>
<p>But it makes me wonder whether the FCC would get bent out of shape if &#8220;he&#8221; exposed one of his nipples at a Superbowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
