<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In “Irreligion,” mathematician John Paulos explains why arguments for God just don&#8217;t add up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry J. Carter</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/#comment-16151</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry J. Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/#comment-16151</guid>
		<description>I've added the word "the" and started over. Lost access to the old one because of sig-in issues. Be warned: I need to more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added the word &#8220;the&#8221; and started over. Lost access to the old one because of sig-in issues. Be warned: I need to more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Klarmann</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/#comment-16147</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Klarmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/#comment-16147</guid>
		<description>LJC: What's become of www.messiancdruid.blogspot.com? It's your DI login href, but Blogspot says it doesn't exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LJC: What&#8217;s become of <a href="http://www.messiancdruid.blogspot.com?" rel="nofollow">http://www.messiancdruid.blogspot.com?</a> It&#8217;s your DI login href, but Blogspot says it doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry J. Carter</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/#comment-16145</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry J. Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/02/13/in-%e2%80%9cirreligion%e2%80%9d-mathematician-john-paulos-explains-why-arguments-for-god-just-dont-add-up/#comment-16145</guid>
		<description>"According to Christians, for example...blah, blah, blah..."

When did christians become the authority? It is easy to show the silliness of man-made belief systems {religion}. Why not poke the big dog instead of the weeney dog? I do think his "good start when he insists that you can’t really argue whether God exists unless you define what you mean by “God.” got quickly derailed...  Too Bad. 

"He recognizes, for example, that some people use the term God to refer to the laws of physics or nature itself. This book, however, is addressed to those who believe in a more traditional version of God:" again why pick on the little guy? Jesus' greatest rebukes were reserved for those who followed the "traditions of the elders, and put away God's Commandments."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to Christians, for example&#8230;blah, blah, blah&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>When did christians become the authority? It is easy to show the silliness of man-made belief systems {religion}. Why not poke the big dog instead of the weeney dog? I do think his &#8220;good start when he insists that you can’t really argue whether God exists unless you define what you mean by “God.” got quickly derailed&#8230;  Too Bad. </p>
<p>&#8220;He recognizes, for example, that some people use the term God to refer to the laws of physics or nature itself. This book, however, is addressed to those who believe in a more traditional version of God:&#8221; again why pick on the little guy? Jesus&#8217; greatest rebukes were reserved for those who followed the &#8220;traditions of the elders, and put away God&#8217;s Commandments.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
