<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I wish all of those silly people would quit believing things that they can&#8217;t prove.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/01/21/i-wish-all-of-those-silly-people-would-quit-believing-things-that-they-cant-prove/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/01/21/i-wish-all-of-those-silly-people-would-quit-believing-things-that-they-cant-prove/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edgar Montrose</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/01/21/i-wish-all-of-those-silly-people-would-quit-believing-things-that-they-cant-prove/#comment-15817</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgar Montrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=2068#comment-15817</guid>
		<description>Every night I go to bed believing that, "Tomorrow will be a better day."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every night I go to bed believing that, &#8220;Tomorrow will be a better day.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlon</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/01/21/i-wish-all-of-those-silly-people-would-quit-believing-things-that-they-cant-prove/#comment-15816</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=2068#comment-15816</guid>
		<description>Erich,

I have always been a little uncomfortable with the common usage of the idea of "proof". The word is so absolute. I'm kind of surprised that Edge's question was phrased as it was. 

There are proofs in logic and in mathematics, and in a different way in law, but science looks for a pursuasive accumulation of evidence and rarely reaches the concreteness of "proof". (I am not a scientist so correct me if I'm wrong.)

Accumulation of evidence has convinced me of the reality of man-made climate change, but "proof"? How do we get there?

Rational people believe all sorts of things without proof. That doesn't mean there are not good reasons to believe it.

Anyway, my hasty two cents worth.

Marlon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erich,</p>
<p>I have always been a little uncomfortable with the common usage of the idea of &#8220;proof&#8221;. The word is so absolute. I&#8217;m kind of surprised that Edge&#8217;s question was phrased as it was. </p>
<p>There are proofs in logic and in mathematics, and in a different way in law, but science looks for a pursuasive accumulation of evidence and rarely reaches the concreteness of &#8220;proof&#8221;. (I am not a scientist so correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.)</p>
<p>Accumulation of evidence has convinced me of the reality of man-made climate change, but &#8220;proof&#8221;? How do we get there?</p>
<p>Rational people believe all sorts of things without proof. That doesn&#8217;t mean there are not good reasons to believe it.</p>
<p>Anyway, my hasty two cents worth.</p>
<p>Marlon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
