<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t stare at dead things or animals having sex.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: projektleiterin</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-15985</link>
		<dc:creator>projektleiterin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-15985</guid>
		<description>And now he wants to sell slices of dead bodies to private individuals. - Ugh.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,532934,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now he wants to sell slices of dead bodies to private individuals. - Ugh.<br />
<a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,532934,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,532934,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: projektleiterin</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-15983</link>
		<dc:creator>projektleiterin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-15983</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"I always had bodies that were donated – otherwise it would have been against my aim of democratising anatomy. But my reputation suffered. I had to go to court [when the allegations surfaced in Der Spiegel] and I won. I was fed up with being mixed up with the copycat exhibitors. &lt;strong&gt;You cannot know where a Chinese corpse comes from. There are no Chinese bodies in any of my exhibitions&lt;/strong&gt;. [emphasis mine]"&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/gunther-von-hagens-under-the-skin-of-doctor-death-395556.html

Compare it with this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The controversial German anatomist Gunther von Hagens last night agreed to return seven corpses to China after admitting that the bodies used in his exhibitions might have come from executed prisoners.

Professor Von Hagens, whose show Body Worlds provoked fascination and disgust when it opened in London two years ago, said the corpses would now be buried. His statement follows a damning exposé this week by the German magazine Der Spiegel.

It revealed that at least two corpses out of some 647 stored by the anatomist at his centre in China had bullet holes in their skulls. Splashing the story on its cover under the headline Dr Death, the magazine this week produced damning email correspondence from Prof Von Hagens' Chinese manager, Sui Hongjin. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,2763,1129261,00.html

What a hypocrite!

And what can you expect from someone anyway who says things like, "[I] enjoyed operating in a Communist country."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/gunther-von-hagens-under-the-skin-of-doctor-death-395556.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;I always had bodies that were donated – otherwise it would have been against my aim of democratising anatomy. But my reputation suffered. I had to go to court [when the allegations surfaced in Der Spiegel] and I won. I was fed up with being mixed up with the copycat exhibitors. <strong>You cannot know where a Chinese corpse comes from. There are no Chinese bodies in any of my exhibitions</strong>. [emphasis mine]&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/gunther-von-hagens-under-the-skin-of-doctor-death-395556.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/gunther-von-hagens-under-the-skin-of-doctor-death-395556.html</a></p>
<p>Compare it with this:</p>
<blockquote><p>The controversial German anatomist Gunther von Hagens last night agreed to return seven corpses to China after admitting that the bodies used in his exhibitions might have come from executed prisoners.</p>
<p>Professor Von Hagens, whose show Body Worlds provoked fascination and disgust when it opened in London two years ago, said the corpses would now be buried. His statement follows a damning exposé this week by the German magazine Der Spiegel.</p>
<p>It revealed that at least two corpses out of some 647 stored by the anatomist at his centre in China had bullet holes in their skulls. Splashing the story on its cover under the headline Dr Death, the magazine this week produced damning email correspondence from Prof Von Hagens&#8217; Chinese manager, Sui Hongjin. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,2763,1129261,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,2763,1129261,00.html</a></p>
<p>What a hypocrite!</p>
<p>And what can you expect from someone anyway who says things like, &#8220;[I] enjoyed operating in a Communist country.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/gunther-von-hagens-under-the-skin-of-doctor-death-395556.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/gunther-von-hagens-under-the-skin-of-doctor-death-395556.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich Vieth</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14901</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Vieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14901</guid>
		<description>Here's an article on a multi-front attack on Halloween:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Say a prayer, a spell, or a demonic incantation for Halloween. This October, as in past Octobers, many schools are refusing to celebrate the holiday. Others have recast it as "Fall-o-Ween" or "Orange and Black Day" or, in words carefully calibrated to be as generic as possible, the "Fall Festival."&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.reason.com/news/show/123222.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an article on a multi-front attack on Halloween:</p>
<blockquote><p>Say a prayer, a spell, or a demonic incantation for Halloween. This October, as in past Octobers, many schools are refusing to celebrate the holiday. Others have recast it as &#8220;Fall-o-Ween&#8221; or &#8220;Orange and Black Day&#8221; or, in words carefully calibrated to be as generic as possible, the &#8220;Fall Festival.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/123222.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/news/show/123222.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Baker</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14890</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14890</guid>
		<description>Grumpy, your received some feedback from several people about the impression you were creating. Take it for what it's worth and move on. 

Much of what I have written here is quite germane to the "social behavior" topic, including my very first observation, which was drawn from sociolinguistics, and which you apparently chose to perceive as a personal attack. Your "pregnancy is not brain surgery" line is not going to convince anyone that you have much insight into the social dynamics of the human animal. Here's a hint: not all communicative acts that humans engage in have the purpose of exchanging information about a technical topic.

The work you have done sounds very valuable and you are evidently quite intelligent.  But please realize that  your initial comment was not stating your perspective, but instead a claim to *objectively* know which category of experience pregnancy belongs to, and a value judgment that women talk too much (endlessly) about this subject. Both your category assignment and the "endlessly" comment reflect your subjective opinion. Do you think that if you had stated your initial observation more clearly as your subjective opinion, you would have gotten the reaction you did?

Yes, I have quite strong feelings on this subject. That, my dear, is the point. Perhaps I wouldn't need to be so passionate about this subject if I lived in Sweden or some country with good family leave and maternal health policies and an open, healthy attitude toward sexuality and reproductive issues. But I don't. In the kind of society I want to live in, every child is born into a welcoming community and all parents have access to the supportive services they need. Until that day, hurrah for all the uppity women who talk and agitate so endlessly to bring about change and better outcomes for pregnant women and babies.

Perhaps, if you want others to see your perspective, you might model this behavior?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumpy, your received some feedback from several people about the impression you were creating. Take it for what it&#8217;s worth and move on. </p>
<p>Much of what I have written here is quite germane to the &#8220;social behavior&#8221; topic, including my very first observation, which was drawn from sociolinguistics, and which you apparently chose to perceive as a personal attack. Your &#8220;pregnancy is not brain surgery&#8221; line is not going to convince anyone that you have much insight into the social dynamics of the human animal. Here&#8217;s a hint: not all communicative acts that humans engage in have the purpose of exchanging information about a technical topic.</p>
<p>The work you have done sounds very valuable and you are evidently quite intelligent.  But please realize that  your initial comment was not stating your perspective, but instead a claim to *objectively* know which category of experience pregnancy belongs to, and a value judgment that women talk too much (endlessly) about this subject. Both your category assignment and the &#8220;endlessly&#8221; comment reflect your subjective opinion. Do you think that if you had stated your initial observation more clearly as your subjective opinion, you would have gotten the reaction you did?</p>
<p>Yes, I have quite strong feelings on this subject. That, my dear, is the point. Perhaps I wouldn&#8217;t need to be so passionate about this subject if I lived in Sweden or some country with good family leave and maternal health policies and an open, healthy attitude toward sexuality and reproductive issues. But I don&#8217;t. In the kind of society I want to live in, every child is born into a welcoming community and all parents have access to the supportive services they need. Until that day, hurrah for all the uppity women who talk and agitate so endlessly to bring about change and better outcomes for pregnant women and babies.</p>
<p>Perhaps, if you want others to see your perspective, you might model this behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14889</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14889</guid>
		<description>Vicki, I have not responded to your various comments about *pregnancy* because they are irrelevant to my comment about the *social behavior* that I mentioned in my original comment.  If you had made any effort to read and understand *my* comments, you would see that they have never had anything to do with pregnancy, per se.  The trouble is that *you* seem to be overly sensitive about this subject -- as demonstrated by things such as:  a) your extreme over-reaction to my comments; b) your very long, disproportional replies; c) your ad hominem attacks; d) your failure to address the substance of my comment about the social behavior that I mentioned; etc.  

Perhaps my own perspective on this subject would help you to better see my point of view.  I spent a large percentage of my career working in the medical device manufacturing industry, making very complex devices for monitoring the function of the central and peripheral nervous system.  Among other things, these devices were used to monitor the functioning of the brain and spinal cord during extremely high-risk neurosurgeries; e.g., 12+ hour operations where a bad outcome would almost certainly leave the patient paralyzed, brain dead, or just plain dead.  Accordingly, based on *my* experience with surgical matters, pregnancy is just  not a big deal.  Perhaps it is, or perhaps it is to you, given your experience, but, from my perspective, well, it's not brain surgery, at least not in most cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki, I have not responded to your various comments about *pregnancy* because they are irrelevant to my comment about the *social behavior* that I mentioned in my original comment.  If you had made any effort to read and understand *my* comments, you would see that they have never had anything to do with pregnancy, per se.  The trouble is that *you* seem to be overly sensitive about this subject &#8212; as demonstrated by things such as:  a) your extreme over-reaction to my comments; b) your very long, disproportional replies; c) your ad hominem attacks; d) your failure to address the substance of my comment about the social behavior that I mentioned; etc.  </p>
<p>Perhaps my own perspective on this subject would help you to better see my point of view.  I spent a large percentage of my career working in the medical device manufacturing industry, making very complex devices for monitoring the function of the central and peripheral nervous system.  Among other things, these devices were used to monitor the functioning of the brain and spinal cord during extremely high-risk neurosurgeries; e.g., 12+ hour operations where a bad outcome would almost certainly leave the patient paralyzed, brain dead, or just plain dead.  Accordingly, based on *my* experience with surgical matters, pregnancy is just  not a big deal.  Perhaps it is, or perhaps it is to you, given your experience, but, from my perspective, well, it&#8217;s not brain surgery, at least not in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Baker</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14880</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14880</guid>
		<description>You know, Grumpy, I am actually fairly busy myself. 

 I have given you several good reasons and suggestions for thought, drawing on personal experience as well as study of anthropology and history, why conversation and social bonding around childbearing is not only natural but necessary. You haven't acknowledged any of them. Until your brain is ready to absorb new information, I guess the question of why  women "seem so interested in discussing pregnancy" is destined to be forever a mystery to you. And my time is better spent elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Grumpy, I am actually fairly busy myself. </p>
<p> I have given you several good reasons and suggestions for thought, drawing on personal experience as well as study of anthropology and history, why conversation and social bonding around childbearing is not only natural but necessary. You haven&#8217;t acknowledged any of them. Until your brain is ready to absorb new information, I guess the question of why  women &#8220;seem so interested in discussing pregnancy&#8221; is destined to be forever a mystery to you. And my time is better spent elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Baker</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14879</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14879</guid>
		<description>Grumpy, here's another thought for you. I think if you would actually observe real conversations about childbirth, you might be surprised at how many are not initiated by the mom-to-be. It's like people just know that a woman is pregnant, without being told! (some kind of 6th sense I guess) And they want to talk to her about it! In fact, for a woman to respond "It's a routine biological function, I don't want to talk about it," would actually against all social expectations,More than that, the other person would have reasonable grounds to worry about the fate of a baby born to such an indifferent mother.

Gatomjp - I guess I just assumed that Grumpy was childless. My bad. About Edgar, I have no idea. It's generally true that most men don't become interested in the topic of childbearing until they are involved in their child's birth. It's not always true though - I had several single men come to my pre-birth party (not really a conventional shower) and also sign up to do errands and whatnot after the birth on the sign-up sheet my friend passed around.

By the way, I don't want at all to imply that anyone needs to have children to live a full life or anything like that. I know a few people who have decided not to have kids out of personal conviction, but who go out of their way to be supportive of families with young kids as a way of being involved with the next generation. Even if someone doesn't want to do that, it's OK - they just might want to do a little more observation and reflection before making normative pronouncements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumpy, here&#8217;s another thought for you. I think if you would actually observe real conversations about childbirth, you might be surprised at how many are not initiated by the mom-to-be. It&#8217;s like people just know that a woman is pregnant, without being told! (some kind of 6th sense I guess) And they want to talk to her about it! In fact, for a woman to respond &#8220;It&#8217;s a routine biological function, I don&#8217;t want to talk about it,&#8221; would actually against all social expectations,More than that, the other person would have reasonable grounds to worry about the fate of a baby born to such an indifferent mother.</p>
<p>Gatomjp - I guess I just assumed that Grumpy was childless. My bad. About Edgar, I have no idea. It&#8217;s generally true that most men don&#8217;t become interested in the topic of childbearing until they are involved in their child&#8217;s birth. It&#8217;s not always true though - I had several single men come to my pre-birth party (not really a conventional shower) and also sign up to do errands and whatnot after the birth on the sign-up sheet my friend passed around.</p>
<p>By the way, I don&#8217;t want at all to imply that anyone needs to have children to live a full life or anything like that. I know a few people who have decided not to have kids out of personal conviction, but who go out of their way to be supportive of families with young kids as a way of being involved with the next generation. Even if someone doesn&#8217;t want to do that, it&#8217;s OK - they just might want to do a little more observation and reflection before making normative pronouncements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14878</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14878</guid>
		<description>Again, responding to my critics, it is amazing how much you folks will read into a single word.  One word and I am condemned as a misogynist.  It just so happens my time lately is very limited, so I did not spend nearly as much time deliberating over my post as you all have.  What I was thinking when I wrote my last comment is that childbirth happens every day, every hour, every minute; ergo, it is routine.  It might not be "routine" in the life of an individual woman, but that was not the perspective I had in mind.  Please try harder to realize that whatever personal perspective each of you have on this subject, other people can have different perspectives without being woman-hating beasts.  Honestly, I really wish you folks would take my comments less personally and respond with reasoned arguments instead of ad hominem attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, responding to my critics, it is amazing how much you folks will read into a single word.  One word and I am condemned as a misogynist.  It just so happens my time lately is very limited, so I did not spend nearly as much time deliberating over my post as you all have.  What I was thinking when I wrote my last comment is that childbirth happens every day, every hour, every minute; ergo, it is routine.  It might not be &#8220;routine&#8221; in the life of an individual woman, but that was not the perspective I had in mind.  Please try harder to realize that whatever personal perspective each of you have on this subject, other people can have different perspectives without being woman-hating beasts.  Honestly, I really wish you folks would take my comments less personally and respond with reasoned arguments instead of ad hominem attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatomjp</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14875</link>
		<dc:creator>gatomjp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14875</guid>
		<description>Thanks proj. Part of the reason I get it is because not only am I a guy, but I'm a father too. Childbirth can be messy and painful and scary...but it's also pretty darn cool! One of the coolest things I've ever witnessed! Also, I feel that I have to keep jumping into this discussion so that it doesn't degenerate into just the boys vs the girls.

In one post it was implied that grumpy and Edgar were "childless" males. Is that true? If so, that could help explain grumpy's somewhat skewed "outsider" viewpoint of the process. Once you've been a part of it all the yucky stuff takes a back seat to the coolness of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks proj. Part of the reason I get it is because not only am I a guy, but I&#8217;m a father too. Childbirth can be messy and painful and scary&#8230;but it&#8217;s also pretty darn cool! One of the coolest things I&#8217;ve ever witnessed! Also, I feel that I have to keep jumping into this discussion so that it doesn&#8217;t degenerate into just the boys vs the girls.</p>
<p>In one post it was implied that grumpy and Edgar were &#8220;childless&#8221; males. Is that true? If so, that could help explain grumpy&#8217;s somewhat skewed &#8220;outsider&#8221; viewpoint of the process. Once you&#8217;ve been a part of it all the yucky stuff takes a back seat to the coolness of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: projektleiterin</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/10/17/dont-stare-at-dead-things-or-sexy-things-unless/#comment-14872</link>
		<dc:creator>projektleiterin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=1702#comment-14872</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Vicki!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Vicki!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.558 seconds -->
