We can only wonder what they mean by saying their journal is "peer-reviewed." Who are the "peers" to a bunch of blatant liars who want to destroy the reputation of science? I suppose they have a panel of Protestant evangelical preachers?

The problem is their specifying up front that any data that doesn't match the theory will be disregarded! Science is about fitting theories to match all the data found, not the other way around.

To theists: Man wrote a book called The Bible to explain God's wants. God made everything else. Scientists read the original God-given universe, not the interpretation. When very careful reading of God's own creation disagrees with man's book, then believers in the infallibility of the book get very upset.

New research suggests that the earth is 12,000 years old. Scientific procedures were used. All of the ages of the people named in the bible were added together systematically, and the results were scrutinized under peer review. Thus, the true age of the earth is circa 12,000 years, which indeed fits much better with the dinosaur skeletons and time required to form mountains.

http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=124