<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploring the universe from big to small: Powers of Ten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/</link>
	<description>Human Animals at the Crossroads of Culture, Science, Religion and Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Large and Small &#124; Dangerous Intersection</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-63889</link>
		<dc:creator>Large and Small &#124; Dangerous Intersection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=808#comment-63889</guid>
		<description>[...] previously posted on the magic of &#8220;Power of Ten,&#8221; a book that inspired me with images of things both very large and very small. Here&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously posted on the magic of &#8220;Power of Ten,&#8221; a book that inspired me with images of things both very large and very small. Here&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-9012</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=808#comment-9012</guid>
		<description>This post reminds me of my college days as a physics major, when I made the mistake of taking astronomy and modern (20th century) physics in the same semester.  In astro, I studied things that were incomprehensibly big (sizes of galaxies, masses of planets, ages of stars, etc.), then, in modern physics, I studied things that were incomprehensibly small (sizes of atoms, masses of neutrons, charges on electrons, etc.).  Eventually, I stopped trying to comprehend the incomprehensible, and just tried to make sure I had the correct signs on the exponents I was using -- e.g., so I didn't accidentally use the mass of a star in an equation calling for the mass of a hydrogen atom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post reminds me of my college days as a physics major, when I made the mistake of taking astronomy and modern (20th century) physics in the same semester.  In astro, I studied things that were incomprehensibly big (sizes of galaxies, masses of planets, ages of stars, etc.), then, in modern physics, I studied things that were incomprehensibly small (sizes of atoms, masses of neutrons, charges on electrons, etc.).  Eventually, I stopped trying to comprehend the incomprehensible, and just tried to make sure I had the correct signs on the exponents I was using &#8212; e.g., so I didn&#8217;t accidentally use the mass of a star in an equation calling for the mass of a hydrogen atom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatomjp</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-9007</link>
		<dc:creator>gatomjp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=808#comment-9007</guid>
		<description>Tired Scholar wrote:
"It was probably the single most influential work which affirmed my “belief” that there is no God. "

Why?? Although I share your belief (which I do not put in quotation marks), why would this presentation affirm it? It certainly affirms the grandeur of the universe, but not necessarily its lack of a creator.

I continue to find your "belief" in science as self-righteous as the most closed-minded fundamentalist Christian's unquestioning trust in the bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tired Scholar wrote:<br />
&#8220;It was probably the single most influential work which affirmed my “belief” that there is no God. &#8221;</p>
<p>Why?? Although I share your belief (which I do not put in quotation marks), why would this presentation affirm it? It certainly affirms the grandeur of the universe, but not necessarily its lack of a creator.</p>
<p>I continue to find your &#8220;belief&#8221; in science as self-righteous as the most closed-minded fundamentalist Christian&#8217;s unquestioning trust in the bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Klarmann</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-8998</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Klarmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=808#comment-8998</guid>
		<description>The original 1968 or the 1977 redone Charles and Ray Eames "Powers of Ten" videos are now legally available free online.
Their Official site with browseable images and lotsa back-story: &lt;a href="http://www.powersof10.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.powersof10.com&lt;/a&gt;

Simpsons Opening based on it: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCfDRvDWid0" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCfDRvDWid0&lt;/a&gt;

Quick Version Edited from Imax: &lt;a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=xmdIbp87KLg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://youtube.com/watch?v=xmdIbp87KLg&lt;/a&gt;

Zoom out from Venice by 10's, James Earl Jones, Korean subtitles: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8zrlOGKI2E" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8zrlOGKI2E&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original 1968 or the 1977 redone Charles and Ray Eames &#8220;Powers of Ten&#8221; videos are now legally available free online.<br />
Their Official site with browseable images and lotsa back-story: <a href="http://www.powersof10.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.powersof10.com</a></p>
<p>Simpsons Opening based on it: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCfDRvDWid0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCfDRvDWid0</a></p>
<p>Quick Version Edited from Imax: <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=xmdIbp87KLg" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=xmdIbp87KLg</a></p>
<p>Zoom out from Venice by 10&#8217;s, James Earl Jones, Korean subtitles: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8zrlOGKI2E" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8zrlOGKI2E</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tired Scholar</title>
		<link>http://dangerousintersection.org/2006/12/07/exploring-the-universe-from-big-to-small-powers-of-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-8996</link>
		<dc:creator>Tired Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=808#comment-8996</guid>
		<description>This sounds similar to a presentation I saw at the famous Rose planetarium in New York City. The presentation had Tom Hank's voice as the narrator and was shown on "high definition" a new technology at the time. It was probably the single most influential work which affirmed my "belief" that there is no God. The vast size of the galaxy I had understood to some extent, but to the see our local cluster, then zoom out again to the supercluster, and then again, and thats just the "visible" Universe. Un-friggin believeable/incomprehendable bigggness, I almost wanna do a complete 360 and run back to God (mommy) now just thinking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds similar to a presentation I saw at the famous Rose planetarium in New York City. The presentation had Tom Hank&#8217;s voice as the narrator and was shown on &#8220;high definition&#8221; a new technology at the time. It was probably the single most influential work which affirmed my &#8220;belief&#8221; that there is no God. The vast size of the galaxy I had understood to some extent, but to the see our local cluster, then zoom out again to the supercluster, and then again, and thats just the &#8220;visible&#8221; Universe. Un-friggin believeable/incomprehendable bigggness, I almost wanna do a complete 360 and run back to God (mommy) now just thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
